Health care reform law proceeds toward an uncertain future
By Government Relations and Communications Staff
October 27, 2011—Even as elements of the 2010 health care reform legislation known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) are implemented, the federal law is unfolding in a landscape of growing uncertainty. This article identifies several key environmental factors currently in play and brief highlights of key advocacy efforts by organized psychology related to the implementation of ACA.
Much of the uncertainty surrounding health care reform relates to the long timeline for implementation, combined with political dynamics and stark budget realities.
Many of the ACA’s fundamental provisions do not take effect until January 2014 – for example, the creation of state-level health insurance exchanges whereby health plans will be made available to individuals and small businesses. ACA is not slated for full implementation until 2015. Even so, several insurance market reforms including the elimination of lifetime and annual visit limits, prohibitions against retroactive cancellation of insurance coverage and denying coverage for children with pre-existing conditions, and benefit appeal rights took effect in September 2010.
Political and Economic Dynamics
According to Doug Walter, JD, legislative and regulatory counsel for the APA Practice Organization, much of what ultimately happens to ACA will depend on who is president in 2013. “There’s a good chance the law will be reexamined if the White House changes parties following the November 2012 election,” Walter says.
Meanwhile, the partisan bickering in Congress that preceded the law’s passage has extended to its implementation. During the first half of 2011, the newly Republican-controlled House voted to repeal the law and then to cut off funding, though the Senate countered these actions.
Congress’s legislative focus for the foreseeable future is on deficit reduction. Under the Budget Control Act of 2011, if a partisan deficit reduction committee representing both chambers of Congress fails by November 2011 to identify at least $1.2 trillion in savings over the next ten years, automatic cuts to Medicare and other programs will result. Similarly, Medicare and Medicaid services could be vulnerable to substantial payment reductions if the committee identifies the requisite budget savings, according to Walter. President Obama has announced his own 10-year deficit plan with significant cuts to Medicare and Medicaid over that period.
Given the federal budget situation, another element of uncertainty involves funding for demonstration projects included in ACA. For example, psychologists are eligible to participate in a Community-based Collaborative Care Network Program and a Medicare Independence at Home demonstration project. However, according to Marilyn Richmond, JD, assistant executive director for government relations with the APA Practice Organization, “ACA demonstration project funding is unlikely when Congress is focused on cutting entitlement programs.”
Recent judicial actions also contribute to the uncertain future course of health care reform. As of September 2011, approximately 30 states had filed or signed onto lawsuits challenging ACA, notably the constitutionality of a central tenet: the mandate requiring individuals to have health insurance coverage. Six federal district courts had ruled on the issue and were evenly split on whether the individual mandate was constitutional. Three federal appeals courts had considered lower court decisions and also came to differing conclusions about constitutionality of the individual mandate. Many observers believe the disparate rulings increase the likelihood that the U.S. Supreme Court will consider the issue, perhaps in 2012.
Key Elements of Reform
Despite this environment, government officials and many others at the federal and state levels are forging ahead with health care reform implementation. Following is a brief summary of key aspects of health care reform law and related advocacy efforts by the APA Practice Organization and APA:
Integrated primary health care delivery models
ACA encourages accountable care organizations (ACO) and smaller-scale patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) as two models for comprehensive, integrated patient care led by primary care providers. ACOs contract with payers to provide a broad range of services to a designated population, with the goal of reducing costs while ensuring quality care. The PCMH model of care involves an interprofessional team of providers led by a personal physician delivering continuous and coordinated care to patients. Under these models, service delivery focuses on “whole person” care that recognizes the mind-body connection and the importance of integrating physical health services with mental and behavioral health services.
The APA Practice Organization and APA are advocating for psychologists’ ability to participate in these models. For example, APA Chief Executive Officer Norman Anderson, PhD, and Executive Director for Professional Practice Katherine C. Nordal, PhD, commended the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for its decision to include psychologists among the providers eligible to participate in Medicare ACOs. In a June 2011 letter, the psychology leaders provided supportive comments to HHS regarding its draft proposal to establish ACOs and implement payments to participating providers, including psychologists, through the Medicare Shared Savings Program.
Recognizing strength in numbers, APA serves on the executive committee of the Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative (PCPCC), a massive coalition intent on fostering the move toward patient-centered medical homes. The broad range of organizations participating in the PCPCC, numbering in the hundreds, includes health care professional associations, hospitals, large employers and health information technology firms, among others. APA is the sole association of its kind on the PCPCC executive committee and helps the coalition sharpen its focus on integrating mental and behavioral health into primary care, according to Dr. Nordal.
Electronic health record keeping
ACA builds on the 2009 law known as the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which substantially expanded the federal government’s effort to establish a national electronic health records (EHR) system by 2014. Proponents believe that, due to administrative and other efficiencies associated with health information technology, electronic records will substantially lower health care costs. Yet these record keeping systems are expensive to implement.
The HITECH Act included incentive payments for designated providers – only physicians, dentists, podiatrists, chiropractors and optometrists, or those defined as “physicians” for purposes of Medicare law – to adopt EHR in their practices. The APA Practice Organization has since pursued legislation to include psychologists. A 2011 bill (S. 539) introduced by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) would make psychologists and other excluded mental health providers eligible for the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. But the bill, along with companion legislation pending introduction in the House, faces an uphill climb toward passage. Any legislation that would increase federal health program costs is subject to intense scrutiny.
The APAPO’s multi-pronged legislative advocacy strategy would address the limitation in HITECH through yet another key initiative: adding psychologists to the Medicare definition of “physician.” As a result of persistent advocacy with members of Congress, including visits to Capitol Hill by several hundred participants during the APAPO’s 2011 State Leadership Conference, bills in both the House (H.R. 831) and Senate (S.483) that would provide for this change in Medicare definition have growing numbers of cosponsors.
Focus on state-level implementation
Under ACA, states have particularly important roles regarding Medicaid expansion, the creation of health insurance exchanges (HIE) and regulations governing insurance companies that offer products through those exchanges. Medicaid programs and HIEs, along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program, serve as the predominant mechanisms whereby ACA will expand coverage to tens of millions of uninsured individuals. ACA puts the onus on states to be innovators in creating models of care though medical home grants and other integrated care initiatives.
So the APA Practice Organization has begun collaborating with state psychological associations to generate resources and expertise that state leaders can use to position psychology for maximal participation in health care reform. In its early stages, the joint initiative will focus on a few concrete issues that psychology needs to be knowledgeable about and plugged into: Medicaid redesign, state health exchange committees, partnering with primary care associations and accountable care organizations.
“State psychological association leaders need to be involved to help ensure that emerging models of care at the state level include behavioral health and psychological services,” Dr. Nordal says. “If we aren’t at the table, it’s because we’re on the menu.”
She and many other leaders at the national and state levels are working to ensure that professional psychology is well represented as ACA and state regulations related to health care reform are developed and implemented, and that psychologists are well positioned to participate fully in the evolving health care system.
Adapted from the Fall 2011 issue of Good Practice magazine, a publication of the APA Practice Organization.